<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guardian Maximus 13-month redux</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ericbrodeur.com/blog/2009/03/21/guardian-maximus-13-month-redux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ericbrodeur.com/blog/2009/03/21/guardian-maximus-13-month-redux/</link>
	<description>Perspectives on storytelling and digital cinema technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 05:55:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: LienDTK </title>
		<link>http://www.ericbrodeur.com/blog/2009/03/21/guardian-maximus-13-month-redux/comment-page-1/#comment-3792</link>
		<dc:creator>LienDTK </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2011 09:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ericbrodeur.com/wp/?p=902#comment-3792</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Well, good news for me, thanks!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, good news for me, thanks!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.ericbrodeur.com/blog/2009/03/21/guardian-maximus-13-month-redux/comment-page-1/#comment-3704</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 19:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ericbrodeur.com/wp/?p=902#comment-3704</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The drive placed into HDD1 is considered the Master in the case you are describing. This is what they told me at least.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ll be populating a new GMax this weekend using an existing 1 TB drive to a new, blank, 1 TB. Let&#039;s see how well HDD1 works copying to HDD2.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The drive placed into HDD1 is considered the Master in the case you are describing. This is what they told me at least.</p>

<p>I&#8217;ll be populating a new GMax this weekend using an existing 1 TB drive to a new, blank, 1 TB. Let&#8217;s see how well HDD1 works copying to HDD2.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dregoth</title>
		<link>http://www.ericbrodeur.com/blog/2009/03/21/guardian-maximus-13-month-redux/comment-page-1/#comment-3690</link>
		<dc:creator>Dregoth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 21:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ericbrodeur.com/wp/?p=902#comment-3690</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This is an excellent (!) piece of information which I can&#039;t find on the vendor&#039;s site..... I&#039;m on the brink of mirrorring my two drives after I decided that my partitioned 1TB drive needed to become whole again due to space considerations (I used a partition for timemachine for which I now have a separate drive). 
And since partitioning (merging) software is hard to come by on OSX I went for a different route..... I removed one of the drives which I connected through a USB enclosure and erased it to a single partition (DU). I then connected the sole remaining HDD in the Newertech through firewire and proceeded to copy the contents to the single partition drive. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But then the question ocurred: When installing the drives does the Newertech have a preference as to which drive is the source and which is the shadow? Will it matter if I use HDD1 or HDD2 as my source since I won&#039;t be installing a replacement but will be using the same original drives?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s still copying, but I&#039;ll comment if you&#039;re info saved the day... Thanks!!!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an excellent (!) piece of information which I can&#8217;t find on the vendor&#8217;s site&#8230;.. I&#8217;m on the brink of mirrorring my two drives after I decided that my partitioned 1TB drive needed to become whole again due to space considerations (I used a partition for timemachine for which I now have a separate drive). 
And since partitioning (merging) software is hard to come by on OSX I went for a different route&#8230;.. I removed one of the drives which I connected through a USB enclosure and erased it to a single partition (DU). I then connected the sole remaining HDD in the Newertech through firewire and proceeded to copy the contents to the single partition drive. </p>

<p>But then the question ocurred: When installing the drives does the Newertech have a preference as to which drive is the source and which is the shadow? Will it matter if I use HDD1 or HDD2 as my source since I won&#8217;t be installing a replacement but will be using the same original drives?</p>

<p>It&#8217;s still copying, but I&#8217;ll comment if you&#8217;re info saved the day&#8230; Thanks!!!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.ericbrodeur.com/blog/2009/03/21/guardian-maximus-13-month-redux/comment-page-1/#comment-2506</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 22:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ericbrodeur.com/wp/?p=902#comment-2506</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@SeymourB, thanks for pointing out the last bullet point; it has been updated accordingly.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Related to your disk-to-disk sync, I use ChronoSync (version 4) for backing up subsets of data between a USB flash drive, my iPhone, and iDisk.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@SeymourB, thanks for pointing out the last bullet point; it has been updated accordingly.</p>

<p>Related to your disk-to-disk sync, I use ChronoSync (version 4) for backing up subsets of data between a USB flash drive, my iPhone, and iDisk.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SeymourB</title>
		<link>http://www.ericbrodeur.com/blog/2009/03/21/guardian-maximus-13-month-redux/comment-page-1/#comment-2495</link>
		<dc:creator>SeymourB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 08:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ericbrodeur.com/wp/?p=902#comment-2495</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I assume the last bullet point should be &quot;If HDD1 fails the system knows as such. Be sure to leave this good drive at HDD2 and replace the failed HDD1&quot;? Because having HDD2 fail, leaving the &quot;good&quot; (but failed) drive at HDD2, and replacing HDD1 (your data) doesn&#039;t make sense.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the review. Personally I don&#039;t mind a lot of screws in a case so long as I&#039;m not flipping drives in and out all the time. Personally I&#039;ve opted for two individual drives in individual cases with manual backups to keep the two in sync. Though between the two cases there&#039;s a total of 16 screws holding everything together, and the syncs are done at my discretion, not automatically.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I assume the last bullet point should be &#8220;If HDD1 fails the system knows as such. Be sure to leave this good drive at HDD2 and replace the failed HDD1&#8243;? Because having HDD2 fail, leaving the &#8220;good&#8221; (but failed) drive at HDD2, and replacing HDD1 (your data) doesn&#8217;t make sense.</p>

<p>Thanks for the review. Personally I don&#8217;t mind a lot of screws in a case so long as I&#8217;m not flipping drives in and out all the time. Personally I&#8217;ve opted for two individual drives in individual cases with manual backups to keep the two in sync. Though between the two cases there&#8217;s a total of 16 screws holding everything together, and the syncs are done at my discretion, not automatically.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

