<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Xackup Bandwagon has left the building</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ericbrodeur.com/blog/2007/02/28/xackup-bandwagon-has-left-the-building/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ericbrodeur.com/blog/2007/02/28/xackup-bandwagon-has-left-the-building/</link>
	<description>From my head to yours : Mac, media, and other random bits</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 16:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: bandwagon</title>
		<link>http://www.ericbrodeur.com/blog/2007/02/28/xackup-bandwagon-has-left-the-building/#comment-183</link>
		<dc:creator>bandwagon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 18:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ericbrodeur.com/blog/2007/02/28/xackup-bandwagon-has-left-the-building/#comment-183</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Why monthly charges instead of a one-time fee?&lt;/strong&gt;

We understand that most people see desktop software as a standalone entity and thus should be charged a one-time fee.  We agree.  However, Bandwagon is NOT just desktop software.
The following reasons should clarify the pricing issues:
1) iTunes metada...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Why monthly charges instead of a one-time fee?</strong></p>
<p>We understand that most people see desktop software as a standalone entity and thus should be charged a one-time fee.  We agree.  However, Bandwagon is NOT just desktop software.<br />
The following reasons should clarify the pricing issues:<br />
1) iTunes metada&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
