Archive for September, 2009

Sep 30 2009

How to send Google Reader stories to Evernote’s web interface

Published by Eric under GTD & DIY, Internet

Evernote logoFor the longest time I used DEVONthink for gathering project-related information into one place: Word and PDF docs, scanned images, web pages, etc. The downside to this approach is requiring your computer nearby.

This prompted me to try Evernote which has its feet on the desktop, iPhone, Blackberry, and the web. Although lacking the depth of DEVONthink, Evernote is excellent at clipping web pages, storing images and documents, and keeping everything within reach from anywhere.

If you’re using Google Reader to manage your news intake, Evernote’s web clipping just got easier when you’re away from the desktop application. Learn how to configure Reader to send entire blog posts to Evernote without browser extensions.

Comments

Sep 25 2009

Solution to DISQUS and WordPress RSS feed breakage

Published by Eric under Blogs & People, Internet

WordPress logoSome time ago I tried the DISQUS plug-in for WordPress and discovered it broke my RSS feed due to a JavaScript bug. DISQUS support didn’t have a solution at the time so I deactivated the plug-in.

A recent search unveiled a workaround by disabling the Comment Count setting in the Advanced Settings of the plug-in.

It works, although a genuine fix would be ideal. With version 3.0 on the horizon I doubt they are looking backward.

Comments

Sep 25 2009

The Apple backlash is nothing new

Published by Eric under History, Macintosh, Musings

apple-logo-mergedWith growing regularity people are expressing their dislike of Apple’s implementation of equipment and policies. It’s the “Apple backlash” as noted in a recent story at TechCrunch.

I’m astonished that anyone thinks Apple has become more “open” and that their overbearing control tactics are new.

Then

Apple is not operating any differently today than decades ago. Price premiums are nothing new: the original Mac cost $2,495. Peripheral expansion used proprietary or specialty ports like ADB, AppleTalk, and the DB-15 video port (pic | more). Mac OS updates (say from 7 to 8.0) forced developers to upgrade their code – backward compatibility was never a concern of Apple’s.

Despite this, Macintosh owners endured the expense and inconvenience of a computer system that was vastly different than the IBM, Atari, Amiga, or Commodore of the day.

Now: Same Ol’ Apple

Fast forward to the 21st century. Disgruntled Windows users are moving to the Macintosh platform and as that demographic grows, so does Apple’s market share. Apple continues to innovate or redefine existing markets like the portable music player and the mobile phone. Although Microsoft and countless others were “in the game” long before, it took Apple’s vision to break out of the mediocrity.

These Switchers are unconsciously a victim to what has made the Macintosh platform successful: Apple’s tight control.

Also consider that Switchers have swallowed (for years) the “backward compatibility” and “have it your way” pill from Microsoft. Suddenly they discover it ain’t so on the Mac. They complain about being locked into hardware and software, almost demanding that Apple bend to their wishes or that Apple will somehow “pay the price.”

Apple didn’t care then and they don’t care now. I heard the same complaints in the 80s.

iPhone App Store Complaints

Apple’s subjective review process needs improvement but this is new territory for them – dare I say – the mobile market as a whole.

Let them work out the kinks and learn from their mistakes.

iTunes and iPhone

A new complaint is iTunes not allowing certain iPhone firmware downgrades. It’s probably a conspiracy to stop the jailbreaking but Apple is entitled to do so according to the iPhone license agreement. It’s also their way of ensuring (at least in theory) a consistent user experience. Nothing new here.

iTunes and AAC

Apple should have made MP3 the default ripping codec in iTunes but using AAC is no worse than Windows Media Player defaulting to WMA and turning on the copy-protection flag. You can imagine my surprise (years ago) when I ripped dozens of compact discs in Windows Media Player and couldn’t play the files when I reinstalled Windows.

iTunes Music Store

No one likes Digital Rights Management but after a few years Apple abandoned DRM completely. Previous DRM-enabled purchases still worked and could be upgraded to DRM-free for a reasonable fee.

In contrast, Microsoft and other companies have launched and closed online music stores: MSN Music. Yahoo Music, and Wal-Mart just to name a few. These closures left customers scrambling to burn CDs or lose their purchases entirely.

Closing Thoughts

The current “Apple backlash” demonstrates nothing more than a fundamental misunderstanding of Apple’s way of doing business. Possibly excusable for a consumer but not for the Internet media or a tech expert.

Everyone will smile and roll their eyes when Microsoft continues their history of blunders but Apple is being held to expectations that are based on hopeful fabrications instead of historical precedence.

The reality is a past where it was “Apple’s way or the highway” which continues today and will do so in the future.

Why? Because it worked.

Comments

Sep 11 2009

Problems with iTunes 9 and iPhone restore

Published by Eric under Macintosh, Mobiles

iTunesI’ve never had reason to perform a Restore operation on my iPhone 3G until the 3.1 software update. For whatever reason the iPhone became sluggish and unresponsive, then operate as normal, and back to slow.

Over the months I’ve heard of people restoring their iPhone to factory defaults and reloading their applications using the Restore function in iTunes. Thinking this was a solid process I went ahead with a Restore.

That’s where my problems began.

iTunes 9

I’m using the new iTunes 9.0 under OS X 10.5.7 which may have who-knows-what bugs. I connected my iPhone, clicked Restore, and instructed iTunes to perform a backup. Some time later the iPhone restarted and asked to be connected to iTunes. I dis-/re-connected the iPhone. iTunes recognized and activated it.

Now it gets interesting.

So Where’s the Restore?

Nothing else happened. My iPhone was devoid of my data but, fortunately, iTunes retained all of the apps and their menu placement. I anticipated being asked to perform a Restore but nothing. So I clicked Sync. Some time later the Sync was finished and my data was copied to my iPhone.

Back in business,” I thought but wait a minute…some apps were completely missing from the iPhone and iTunes:

  • System Activity Monitor
  • TwitterFon Pro
  • PicPosterous
  • Prowl

iTunes 9 allowed me to re-download (at no charge) and the apps synced successfully to the iPhone.

This isn’t what I expected from the Restore operation. Perhaps the manual Sync is part of the process but iTunes never suggested it as the next step in the process. What’s more of a concern were the missing applications. Perhaps this is a unique occurrence or a bug in iTunes 9.

After all of this, did the Restore fix the iPhone’s performance problem? I haven’t used the phone yet so it’s too early to tell. Look for a future update.

UPDATE: some (18 to be accurate) of the apps from the Restore aren’t the latest version according to iPhone App Store.

UPDATE: thankfully this process has restored my iPhone 3.1 to what I consider normal performance.

Comments

Sep 10 2009

Impromptu performance test of GMax and G-RAID over FireWire 400

Published by Eric under Avid, Final Cut Pro, Macintosh

This isn’t the most detailed or controlled test but on a whim I used InTech SpeedTools to benchmark two external drives attached to my MacBook Pro via FireWire 400: OWC/NewerTech Guardian Maximus (DIY kit) and the G-Tech G-RAID.

Guardian Maximus (DIY) with 1 TB storage:

  • RAID-1
  • Two 1 TB Western Digital drives
  • 7200 RPM
  • 32 MB cache each

G-RAID with 2 TB storage:

  • RAID-0
  • Two 1 TB drives
  • Speed and cache unknown

GMax results using Extended Test (20-100 MB):
Read = 38 MB/sec, Write = 36 MB/sec

G-RAID results using Extended Test (20-100 MB):
Read = 39 MB/sec, Write = 36 MB/sec

I’ll whip up some FireWire 800 tests at a later date.

Comments

Older Posts »